Key Indicators | Supporting Documents | Weightage |
Key Indicator – 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40) | ||
2.1.1 Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
2.1.1.1. Number of students admitted year wise during last five years 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years |
Data template of number of sanctioned seats and number of students admitted yearwise during last five years uploaded (No Link) Proof for sanctioned seats from prospectus | 20 |
2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (exclusive of supernumerary seats)
2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years. |
Number of students admitted under reserved categories first and last cutoffs to support underadmissions under ST category Reservation policy of GOI EWS reservation policy | 20 |
Key Indicator – 2.2. Catering to student Diversity (50) | ||
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow learners (Write description in maximum of 500 words) | MOM for identification and redressal of slow learners DBT STAR COLLEGE scheme Index of /files/NAAC-SSR/Criteria3/Criteria3.1/Criteria 3.1.1 and 3.1.3/ (shivajicollege.ac.in) Innovation projects and Awards Supporting documents Capacity Building Proof Collaborative Activities Proofs for Seminars-Conferences- Workshop on Quality Students involved in organising various events and members of societies Copy of timetable for tutorials Monthly mentor- mentee meeting minutes_2019-20 | 30 |
2.2.2 Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | Data template of Teacher data, UG student data, PG student data uploaded (No link) | 20 |
Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50) | ||
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences. Write description in maximum of 500 words | Department specific activities as part of curriculum - Field Trip Reports of Deptt of EVS Deptt of Environment Sciences Botany experiential learning- field trips Deptt of Geography-Field Trips Reports Deptt of Zoology - Field Trips DBT sponsored Star college scheme and Science Setu programme Faculty guided projects Innovation projects Capacity Building Collaborative Activities Proofs for Seminars-Conferences-Workshop Placement cell -Capacity Building Student's participation in activities-additional proof Best practices - student's participation Student's participation in herbal garden, vermi compost unit, paper recycling unit Add on courses details edX course Coursera details Enactus website developed by students ENACTUS ACTIVITIES REPORT tedxshivajicollege website placementcell website placementportal/student/ Film on climate change made by SPADE students Film on socio economic problems made by students Video made by students of equal opprtunity cell Student's contribution to college magazine, newsletters of various societies | 20 |
2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. Describe in maximum 500 words. | Details of Online classes -google forms filled by teachers ICT tools used for teaching learning process Department- wise ICT infrastructure in college Total Number of Computers ICT infrastructure in Library Some faculty members have created online digital repositories for lectures on platforms like YouTube. | 15 |
2.3.3. Ratio of mentors to students for academic and other related issues. (Data for the latest completed academic year)
Number of mentors Number of students assigned to each Mentor |
Data Template of yearwise UG and PG students enrolled and full time teachers on roll-Uploaded (No link) Mentor-Mentee list 2019- 20 Minutes of meetings of formation of mentor-mentee list_2019-20 Monthly mentor-mentee meeting minutes_2019-20 | 15 |
Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60) | ||
2.4. 1 Average percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | Data Template for average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts uploaded (NO LINK) List of the faculty members authenticated by the Head of HEI uploaded (NO LINK) Minutes of workload committee meetings uploasded | 20 |
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt.year wise during the last five years. |
Data Template of Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D uploaded (NO LINK) Ph.D degrees of full time teachers departmentwise | 20 |
2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full-time teachers in the same institution.
(Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) |
Data template of Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same instituition uploaded (NO LINK)
Sample of Appointment letters and experience certificates of teachers uploaded (NO LINK) |
20 |
Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30) | ||
2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Upload a description of not more than 500 words. | Screenshots of Internal Assessment Portal and Space portal Internal assesment proofs from Academic audit reports | 15 |
2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient. | Internal assessment notifications for students and teachers Minutes of internal asssessment moderation committees of Departments Sample_Internal Assessment Sheets signed by students Minutes of IA committee meetings | 15 |
Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (60) | ||
2.6.1 Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.
Describe Course Outcomes (COs) for all courses and mechanism of communication within a minimum of 500 characters and maximum of 500 words. |
2.6.1 Pictures of college orientation and Deptt orientation.docx College prospectus societies for extra curricular activities alumnirelationcell 2.6.1 Course Outcome of all programmes | 15 |
2.6.2 Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.
Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs, PSOs and COs in not more than 500 words. |
Academic Audit Proof Student progression- Placement Data (1) Student progression- proof placements Student Progression- Higher education Data Student progression- Higher education Proofs Student progression- Competetive exams Placement cell and Internship Alumni relation cell Minutes of Staff Council Meetings | 15 |
2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students during the last five years.
2.6.3.1. Total number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years. 2.6.3.2. Total number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year wise during the last five years |
Average pass percentage of final year students Annual report | 30 |
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60) | ||
2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process.
Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)
|
60 |